| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp
3019
   |
Posted - 2012.10.24 18:06:00 -
[1] - Quote
Tali Ambraelle wrote:Don't care. Let them mine in high sec. James is an undesirable deserving of ban for interrupting paying customers' game play.
Is this directed at me? If so, I have a few questions.
1. In what way am I an "undesirable"?
2. Why is your opinion about my desirability more important than others'?
3. Why should I get a ban if I do not violate the EULA?
4. How am I interrupting others' game play by improving it?
5. Is it "game play" if they're AFK?
Thanks! 
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ MinerBumping.com -½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½The daily saga of the New Order's quest to conquer all highsec by bumping miners out of range. |
James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp
3019
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 18:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
In all seriousness though, there are plenty of ways to defend against bumpers. Go mine in low/null and shoot them.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ MinerBumping.com -½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½The daily saga of the New Order's quest to conquer all highsec by bumping miners out of range. |
James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp
3019
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 18:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tali Ambraelle wrote:James 315 wrote:In all seriousness though, there are plenty of ways to defend against bumpers. Go mine in low/null and shoot them. In all seriousness though, no. They don't want to because they don't want to be interrupted in THEIR game play style. Whether shooting or bumping. Your logic is wrong.
Why should my game play style be interrupted then, pray tell?
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ MinerBumping.com -½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½The daily saga of the New Order's quest to conquer all highsec by bumping miners out of range. |
James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp
3021
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 18:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tali Ambraelle wrote:Because your game play style was not being interrupted by miners. You're simply annoying people. That's not game play, that's undesirable behavior.
But you are attempting to interrupt my game play style, even suggesting that I ought to be banned. I am not annoying people; far more people support what I do than support you. It seems like I win on desirability.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ MinerBumping.com -½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½The daily saga of the New Order's quest to conquer all highsec by bumping miners out of range. |
James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp
3021
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 18:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
Tali Ambraelle wrote:False. Clearly more are annoyed at you. You simply have a very vocal minority of fellow undesirables. In your little world of lolRP, you are winning. In reality, you need culling. You should be careful of who you annoy Josh
Not so clear. Where's the evidence more people are against me than with me? I've got more than 170 shareholders and run one of the most popular EVE blogs in existence. What do you got?
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ MinerBumping.com -½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½The daily saga of the New Order's quest to conquer all highsec by bumping miners out of range. |
James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp
3021
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 18:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tali Ambraelle wrote:Except that your shareholders were coerced by your extortion.
Sounds like you need to get more familiar with my business.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ MinerBumping.com -½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½The daily saga of the New Order's quest to conquer all highsec by bumping miners out of range. |
James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp
3027
|
Posted - 2012.10.25 00:09:00 -
[7] - Quote
Vanyr Andrard wrote:The bumpers of the new order don't join the same corp, so that it is impossible to wardec them all.
Now we get right to the heart of the matter. The reason the New Order is Invincible is not because of faulty game mechanics, but because...
How do you fight an idea?
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ MinerBumping.com -½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½The daily saga of the New Order's quest to conquer all highsec by bumping miners out of range. |
James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp
3027
|
Posted - 2012.10.25 00:16:00 -
[8] - Quote
Zkaor wrote:To 315, you calim to want more risk for hi-sec but not for u. Why is this ?
To increase risk in highsec for me, you must also increase risk in highsec for everyone else, no? Nerf Concord and you'll have risk all around.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ MinerBumping.com -½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½The daily saga of the New Order's quest to conquer all highsec by bumping miners out of range. |
James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp
3032
|
Posted - 2012.10.25 02:54:00 -
[9] - Quote
Well, yes and no. Even back then, the Wiki says it was only griefing when used "outside of a fight". But the New Order only bumps to fight for what's right, to fight for a better highsec. So even back then it would have been allowed.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ MinerBumping.com -½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½The daily saga of the New Order's quest to conquer all highsec by bumping miners out of range. |
James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp
3032
|
Posted - 2012.10.25 03:00:00 -
[10] - Quote
NEONOVUS wrote:James 315 wrote:Well, yes and no. Even back then, the Wiki says it was only griefing when used "outside of a fight". But the New Order only bumps to fight for what's right, to fight for a better highsec. So even back then it would have been allowed. If you want to fight come to Ravarath and start shooting my retriever. Otherwise you have no fight and thus can not claim exception.
I'd be more than happy to take you up on your offer. So which of the three Tests will you be invoking?
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ MinerBumping.com -½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½The daily saga of the New Order's quest to conquer all highsec by bumping miners out of range. |
| |
|